Background: Accurate assessment of bleeding risk is essential to ensure patient safety, particularly in high-risk hospital departments. The ISTH-BAT (Bleeding Assessment Tool) has long been used to screen for inherited bleeding disorders; however, its applicability in acute nursing settings remains limited. The SH-BRAT (Selwan Hamza’s Bleeding Risk Assessment Tool) was recently developed as a nurse-led, context-specific tool designed to identify bleeding risk early during hospital admission. Aim: This study aimed to conduct a theoretical comparative analysis between the SH-BRAT and BAT tools regarding their structure, clinical applicability, and suitability for nursing use. Design: A narrative comparative design was utilized to critically evaluate the similarities and differences between the two tools. Setting: This study was conceptually conducted within the context of hospital-based nursing practice, drawing on evidence from literature, expert panel reviews, and tool validation data. Sample: No human subjects were involved in this theoretical analysis. However, the comparison incorporated expert evaluations from eight professionals who previously assessed the SH-BRAT tool during its validation phase. Tools of Data Collection: Data were gathered from a structured review of scientific literature and expert feedback previously collected during the content validation of SH-BRAT, alongside published data related to the BAT tool. Results: The SH-BRAT showed advantages in terms of speed, simplicity, and nursing integration, making it more suitable for frontline risk identification. In contrast, BAT remains a valuable diagnostic tool but requires specialized assessment and longer time for completion. The SH-BRAT’s binary scoring and structured format support rapid decision-making during patient admission. Conclusion: The SH-BRAT has strong potential for integration into clinical nursing practice. Its design supports early risk stratification by nurses and complements existing safety protocols in acute settings. Recommendations: It is recommended to conduct further reliability testing of the SH-BRAT and pilot its application in clinical environments such as oncology and surgical units. Integration into nursing education and protocols may enhance safety and improve patient outcomes.
Hamza Elgazzar, S. (2025). Optimizing Nursing Assessment of Bleeding Risk A Theoretical Comparative Analysis of the SH-BRAT and BAT Tools. Egyptian Journal of Health Care, 16(2), 798-813. doi: 10.21608/ejhc.2025.435526
MLA
Selwan Hamza Elgazzar. "Optimizing Nursing Assessment of Bleeding Risk A Theoretical Comparative Analysis of the SH-BRAT and BAT Tools", Egyptian Journal of Health Care, 16, 2, 2025, 798-813. doi: 10.21608/ejhc.2025.435526
HARVARD
Hamza Elgazzar, S. (2025). 'Optimizing Nursing Assessment of Bleeding Risk A Theoretical Comparative Analysis of the SH-BRAT and BAT Tools', Egyptian Journal of Health Care, 16(2), pp. 798-813. doi: 10.21608/ejhc.2025.435526
VANCOUVER
Hamza Elgazzar, S. Optimizing Nursing Assessment of Bleeding Risk A Theoretical Comparative Analysis of the SH-BRAT and BAT Tools. Egyptian Journal of Health Care, 2025; 16(2): 798-813. doi: 10.21608/ejhc.2025.435526